AOPA-Thailand Assists Tsunami
Relief
Pilots and
aircraft from AOPA-Thailand were airborne and headed for the Kra
Peninsula disaster soon after the great tsunami hit the area.
Notably, Khun Tarn and Khun Damri flew surveys of the entire PhiPhi,
Phuket, and the coast to Kaoak. They were very active in
communicating with ground stations and local news outlets. Survivors
were rapidly reported to rescue agencies. AOPA-Thailand member Tom
Claytor flew with Sky News out to the Similan Islands to help survey
the devastation and search for missing and adrift boats. When
spotted, the boats were photographed for future reference and
reported to authorities.
Claytor assessed the situation with awe: "The tsunami didn't just
raze the buildings, it completely swept them all out to sea. It is
unbelievable to see from the air. It looked like pictures I remember
from Hiroshima after the bombing. There was nothing left standing
where the full force of the wave had swept through.
"The disaster effort was really well organized and the country as a
whole handled this horrible crisis extremely well. The tsunami
emergency in Thailand was one example where general aviation in
Thailand was a valuable resource during a time of crisis."
Secretariat Supports ELT Equipment Delay
Effective January 2005, ICAO standards require all aircraft
operating over the open ocean and in areas where search and rescue
is classified as difficult to have a 406 mHz automatic ELT installed
and operational. Segments of the commercial and business aviation
community petitioned ICAO in November 2004 to delay implementation
of this standard until 2007 to permit their fleets' additional time
to equip with the new devices. IAOPA responded to the ICAO request
for comments repeating its two previous statements on the subject
that opposed the requirement.
The current IAOPA comments included the following rationale for its
opposition:
"This was done for reasons of inadequate information regarding the
efficacy of the new ELTs, the cost involved in acquiring the new
ELTs, insufficient research into the improvement of existing ELTs,
and the fact that COSPAS/SARSAT satellites will continue to locate
121.5 distress signals until at least 2009.
"The fundamental issue preventing compliance with ICAO ELT SARPS is
that there have been insufficient supplies of approved ELTs and an
inadequate amount of time to permit aircraft owners and operators to
acquire and install them. And, the record of saved lives as a result
of installed automatic 406 mHz ELTs does not provide a high degree
of assurance in the efficacy of the device. Significantly, recent
moves by large States and coalitions of contiguous States to
designate their entire land masses as difficult SAR areas makes safe
and efficient navigation virtually impossible in large areas of the
world. Further, acquisition and installation costs are prohibitive
for most small aircraft owner/operators.
"Installed ELTs have proved to be only marginally effective in many
cases due to crash impact forces insufficient to activate the device,
destruction of the device in the crash, terrain obstructions
preventing a clear signal path and the transmitting antenna being
covered by aircraft wreckage. New personal locator beacons carried
by a flight crewmember or passenger have a good chance of overcoming
these deficiencies.
"The safety of our affiliates member's lives is quite important.
IAOPA has traditionally supported measures to protect their lives
and aircraft. However, life protection measures must make sense
across a broad spectrum of issues. The rapid move to install
automatic 406 mHz ELTs in the world's general aviation and aerial
work aircraft does not appear to be cost beneficial under the
current requirements or proposals.
"IAOPA recommends the following measures with regard to installed
automatic ELTs transmitting on 121.5/406 mHz:
- For aircraft without an installed automatic ELT, delay
applicability of existing Annex 6 requirements for 406 mHz ELTs
until January 2007.
- For aircraft that currently have an installed automatic 121.5
mHz ELT, delay applicability of Annex 6 requirements for 406 mHz
ELTs until January 2009 or until SAR satellites no longer have a
location capability for 121.5 mHz distress signals.
- Permit the use of personal locator beacons as a substitute for
installed beacons in small general aviation aircraft.
- Establish criteria to determine what constitutes a difficult
SAR area.
- Encourage States to continue research into more rapid and
effective means of detecting and locating aircraft and survivors
in distress."
AOPA-Russia Elects Officers
AOPA-Russia recently elected Michail Markov as President of the
association, outgoing President Leonid Koshelev as Chairman of the
Board and Alexander Krasnyansky as Director. Tatiana Dolguikh
retains her post as Secretary.
Markov is a Test Pilot and General Director of the business aviation
company Jet 2000, based in Moscow. In November 2004 he was appointed
by the Civil Aviation Authority to head the working group of experts
to find a way out of the current crisis in Russian general aviation.
Until recently general aviation had little legal status within
Russia, which lead to the grounding of the entire fleet by the Civil
Aviation Authority. Consequently, corporate jets are forced to
operate under commercial airlines rules. Markov believes that "The
way out is generally seen in enacting normal rules along ICAO
guidelines that would regulate the activities of general aviation in
the country."
Secretariat Provides Security Guidance to ICAO
The Secretariat has been working for three years with various ICAO
groups to define standards and recommended practices for security
measures for general aviation and aerial work. Basic standards for
ICAO Annex 17 - Security were recently drafted but the real
guidance material will be contained in the ICAO Security Manual,
containing extensive advisory materials for States. The Secretariat
recently delivered these recommended guidelines for GA/AW security
practices to the ICAO security directorate.
These materials contain both overall policies and detailed guidance
for States implementing security measures for GA/AW. The basic
concept of GA/AW security, threat and risk assessment techniques,
and specific security measures are provided for the State, aircraft
owners and operators, aviation businesses, and general aviation
airport operators. The guidance is designed to provide wide latitude
to States when seeking to implement security measures. Most
important, all security measures are based on threat and risk
assessments performed by the State. The full text of the
recommendations may be found on the
IAOPA Web site.
Finnish Pilot Group Seeks Airport Protection
A new Finnish pilot group calling itself the Pilots and Aircraft
Owners Association (no current, but possible future, affiliation
with IAOPA) is rallying to the cause of saving the Helsinki-Malmi
Airport, a historic and busy general aviation airport. The 1930s era
international airport still features original hangars and runway
system, but is also the second busiest airport in the country.
Unfortunately, the land on which this metropolitan area airport is
sited has become very valuable and is under threat of closure. If
the airport is closed there will be no tower-controlled general
aviation airports within 100 miles of Finland's capital.
For more detailed information see the
Friends of Malmi Airport Society. It contains an online petition
to save the airport.
Major Alteration/Repair
Avionics costs are high enough without having to spend unnecessary
money on installation. At least two States are debating whether to
classify the retrofit of a 406 mHz ELT into an aircraft already
having a 121.5 mHz ELT as a major alteration. Doing so requires
expensive engineering data to be developed in support of the
alteration, whereas, a minor alteration will be supported by
commonly accepted practices found in existing guidance documents.
While there is no international standard to delineate between major
and minor alterations and repairs, the United States has had some
useful guidelines on the subject.
US Federal Aviation Regulations define a Major Alteration as -
"An alteration not listed in the aircraft, aircraft engine, or
propeller specification, 1) that might appreciably affect weight,
balance, structural strength, performance, powerplant operation,
flight characteristics, or other qualities affecting airworthiness,
or 2) that is not completed according to accepted practices or
cannot be made by elementary operations, is considered a major
alteration."
FAR Part 43, Appendix A goes into greater detail on the subject,
naming certain modifications. Finally,
FAA Advisory Circular 43.13-1B provides guidance on how to
repair and alter aircraft not classified as major events. These
references are applicable only to "N" registered aircraft but should
provide useful background for national authorities seeking guidance
on the subject.
Radio Frequency Spectrum Approaches
While October 2007 sounds like a long time into the future, much
preparation is required for the triennial International
Telecommunications Union World Radiocommunication Conference
(WRC-07) to be held in Geneva, Switzerland, 8 October to 2 November
2007. World radiocommunication conferences (WRC) are held every two
to three years. It is the job of WRC to review, and, if necessary,
revise the
Radio
Regulations, the international treaty governing the use of
the radio-frequency spectrum and the geostationary-satellite and
non-geostationary-satellite orbits.
As the radio spectrum becomes more crowded it is essential that
aviation interests protect their existing spectrum assignments and
request additional frequencies required to expand and improve
aviation communications, navigation, and surveillance uses. Each
State has membership in the Council but many competing interests vie
for scarce frequency assignments within a State's delegation.
Worldwide aviation frequency spectrum needs must be defined and
coordinated by an international body.
ICAO holds observer status within the council and has customarily
defined the needs for frequency assignments for the aviation
community. Therefore, affiliates should ensure that their national
aviation authorities and air traffic services providers are aware of
ICAO State letter E 3/5-04/99, 30 November 2004, "Draft ICAO
position on the items of interest to aviation on the agenda of the
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunication
Conference (2007) (WRC-2007)." While the details of this document
are not important to the GA community, the loss of valuable existing
or requested frequencies carries major safety and operational
implications for the aviation community. Ensure your State
authorities are aware of and support the ICAO position.
|