|
FINAL
PREPARATIONS MADE FOR IAOPA WORLD ASSEMBLY
The 21st
IAOPA World Assembly will be held in Sao Paulo, Brazil 29 September -
4 October 2002. Final preparations are underway to make the first
South American World Assembly a notable event. Speakers from ICAO,
FAA, Brazilian DGAC and aircraft manufacturers are scheduled to bring
participants up to date on a variety of issues facing general aviation
and aerial work operators around the world. Newly elected president of
APPA-Brazil and host of the Assembly, Alan Lowy, said, "We have
planned a variety of business and social events that will make this
Assembly a memorable one. We invite all interested parties to
participate in what promises to be a worthwhile and informative event."
For further information and registration, contact APPA-Brazil at
info@appa.org.br, +55 11 3845 1344, or Ruth Moser,
IAOPA Administrator, at
info@iaopa.org, +1 301 695
2220.
IAOPA PREPARES FOR ICAO AVIATION
SECURITY PANEL MEETING
ICAO
Annex 17, Security, makes no reference to general aviation and
aerial work (GA/AW) activities; the practices included in this annex
apply only to commercial air transportation, specifically airlines. As
a consequence, States are provided with no ICAO guidance regarding
security measures for GA/AW activities. Attempting to apply airline
security measures to GA/AW will prove ineffective and costly.
Ater
input from IAOPA, the February 2002 ICAO High Level Ministerial
Conference on Civil Aviation Security concluded that, "Since
General Aviation operations are very different from commercial air
transport operations, they warrant separate measures within ICAO SARPS
and/or guidance material...." Consequently, the ICAO Aviation
Security Panel was given the responsibility of incorporating separate
measures into Annex 17 and associated advisory materials.
The
IAOPA Secretariat will participate in the upcoming AVSEC Panel meeting,
presenting the case for separate standards and recommended practices
for GA/AW. The working paper submitted to the panel calls for a clear
distinction between commercial air transport, general aviation and
aerial work. Within GA/AW distinctions are called for between large
and small aircraft, with the traditional 5700 kgs. being the dividing
line between the two classifications. Large aircraft would have to
operate under a written security program, outlining the
responsibilities and procedures to be used in safeguarding passengers,
cargo, third parties and the aircraft. Operators of small aircraft
would be responsible for ensuring that State regulations regarding GA/AW
be complied with.
AOPA-UK INTRODUCES FLYING COMPANIONS CERTIFICATE COURSE
AOPA-UK
has introduced a course of instruction designed to increase the
enjoyment, participation and confidence in flying of those who
regularly accompany private pilots. It will enable those who fly
regularly with private pilots to be more involved in the flights and,
therefore, more confident when flying as passengers. The course
consists of a minimum of eight hours dual flying with a flight
instructor and 10 hours of ground training. The course is available
from any flight training organization that is a corporate member of
AOPA.
Although the course does not in itself lead to a pilot's license the
syllabus is an abridged version of the early flight exercises and
ground studies for the PPL. It is appreciated that some flying
companions may wish to continue training for the PPL and the hours
flown on the course may be counted towards that qualification. See www.
aopa.co.uk.
COPA PROTESTS FAA RULING
The
FAA has effectively banned Canadian owner maintained general aviation
airplanes from U.S. airspace. COPA has escalated previous requests to
rescind this ruling by joining with the Experimental Aircraft
Association to request that the FAA Director of the Flight Standards
Service reconsider the matter.
The
joint letter points out that the O-M category in Canada operates to
virtually the same rules that the Canadian amateur-built and advanced
ultralights operate. It also points out that Canadian amateur-built
aircraft have been flying in the U.S. for more than 20 years with an
acceptable degree of safety and the O-M category aircraft operating to
the same rules should see a similar safety record.
AOPA-US
OPENS WEB SITE PROMOTING GENERAL AVIATION
AOPA-US has established a major new website designed to promote
general aviation and aerial work activities. "General Aviation: It's
Working for America" was conceived to answer the question, "What is GA
and why should you care about it?" The site is a diverse and
comprehensive listing of the advantages of GA and why it is important
for America. AOPA-US president Phil Boyer said, "Let's help them [lawmakers,
business leaders, communities] to better understand GA's critical role
in our national economy, the essential role it plays in the daily
lives of all Americans, and that a vital link in our air
transportation system is 'GA Serving America.'" See
www.gaservingamerica.org.
CAA NZ
PREPARES GUIDE TO ESTABLISHING AN AERODROME
An
informative guide entitled "How to Establish a Small Aerodrome" was
recently published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand.
While it contains regulatory and advisory references unique to New
Zealand, the guide is a useful overview of the processes necessary to
start a small airfield anywhere. The guide is available at:
www.caa.govt.nz/safety%20info/booklets_on_web/aerodr_home
UK GENERAL AVIATION AWARENESS COUNCIL FOLLOW UP
"Our
Chairman wrote to the Minister for Aviation earlier this year asking
that central government should be more involved in the provision of a
national network of GA aerodromes. Despite their claim to support the
development of an integrated transport system the Minister reiterated
the long standing policy that 'decisions about the future of
aerodromes must be a matter for their owners. It would not be right
for Government to attempt to direct from the centre what are
essentially local issues. Government cannot force an aerodrome,
whether publicly or privately owned, to stay open if the owner/operator
is determined for business or other reasons to close it.' Obviously
further educational effort is required to get the message through to a
Government that is committed to an integrated transport policy that a
network of aerodromes for the UK is part of the national transport
infrastructure." (www.gaac.co.uk)
|